The G-Cloud buyer’s guide to HR and payroll software.
Everything public sector buyers need to know about finding, evaluating and procuring cloud based HR, payroll and workforce management software through the G-Cloud framework.
Updated August 2026
Procure modern HR and payroll technology with confidence
Public sector organisations manage some of the UK’s largest and most complex workforces.
Employees may work across multiple locations, services, departments and legal entities. They may hold several roles or contracts. They may work shifts, term time arrangements, variable hours or local working patterns.
At the same time HR, payroll, finance, procurement and IT teams must protect sensitive information, maintain reliable audit trails, meet statutory obligations and demonstrate value for public money.
The HRIS platform selected by an organisation therefore matters.
It affects how employees are recruited, onboarded, managed, paid and supported. It also affects the quality of workforce information available to managers and leadership teams.
G-Cloud gives eligible public sector organisations an established route to procure cloud based HR, payroll and workforce management software from listed suppliers.
This guide explains:
- What G-Cloud is
- Whether HR and payroll software can be purchased through it
- Which organisations can use the framework
- How the G-Cloud buying process works
- How to search for suitable HR and payroll services
- How to evaluate suppliers consistently
- What security and data protection evidence to request
- How to assess artificial intelligence within HR software
- What to consider during implementation
- How HBHR supports public sector organisations
- How to begin a procurement through G-Cloud
The answer in one sentence
Yes. Public sector organisations can purchase cloud based HR, payroll and workforce management software through G-Cloud.
G-Cloud is not limited to infrastructure, hosting or technical IT services. Cloud software is a central part of the framework and can include the systems used to manage people, pay, attendance, recruitment, compliance and workforce reporting.
What is G-Cloud?
G-Cloud is a government commercial framework designed to help public sector organisations purchase cloud based technology.
It provides an online catalogue of cloud services from suppliers that have been admitted to the framework.
The G-Cloud 14 framework covers three main service categories:
- Cloud hosting
- Cloud software
- Cloud support
HR, payroll and workforce management platforms are cloud software services when they are hosted in the cloud and accessed through the internet or a private network.
Government Commercial Agency describes G-Cloud 14 as providing access to more than 46,000 services from more than 4,000 suppliers. It identifies benefits including a quicker route to market, access to current cloud technology and the ability to scale services as requirements change.
What is a framework?
A framework is a commercial agreement that establishes:
- Which suppliers are available
- The types of products or services that can be purchased
- The contractual terms that apply
- The process buyers must follow
- The documentation required to award a contract
Framework suppliers have already completed the admission process for the relevant agreement.
This does not mean that every supplier will be suitable for every requirement. The buyer must still define its needs, identify relevant services, evaluate them fairly and document why the selected service offers the best fit.
Can HR and payroll software be purchased through G-Cloud?
Yes. HR and payroll software can be purchased through G-Cloud.
Cloud based HR, payroll and workforce management systems fall within the cloud software category where the service meets the scope of the framework.
This can include software for:
- Core HR
- Payroll
- Managed payroll
- Employee records
- Time and attendance
- Rotas and workforce scheduling
- Recruitment
- Applicant tracking
- Digital onboarding
- Performance management
- Learning management
- Employee self service
- Manager self service
- Absence and leave
- Expenses
- Document management
- Electronic signatures
- Workforce reporting
- Workforce analytics
- Employee engagement
- Artificial intelligence within HR and payroll
For organisations replacing a legacy system or consolidating disconnected software G-Cloud can provide a structured route to identify and purchase an existing cloud service.
The framework is therefore highly relevant to HR, payroll, finance and workforce transformation projects.
It should not be viewed as a framework that is only suitable for hosting, infrastructure or specialist IT teams.
HBHR is available through G-Cloud as an integrated HR, payroll and workforce management platform for eligible public sector organisations.
When is G-Cloud likely to be suitable?
G-Cloud may be suitable where an organisation wants to purchase an established cloud service that can meet a clearly defined requirement.
Typical examples include:
- Replacing a legacy HR system
- Replacing a payroll system
- Combining separate HR and payroll platforms
- Moving away from spreadsheets and manual records
- Introducing employee and manager self service
- Improving time and attendance management
- Connecting rotas and approved hours to payroll
- Introducing better workforce reporting
- Consolidating systems across several organisations or sites
- Improving document control and compliance
- Introducing a managed payroll service connected to HR data
- Giving operational managers better workforce visibility
- Introducing secure and governed AI capabilities
The buyer should be able to describe the required service and assess how well each listed supplier can meet that need.
When may another route be more appropriate?
G-Cloud is principally designed for existing cloud services.
A different procurement route may be more suitable where the requirement is primarily for:
- A completely bespoke digital product
- Non cloud consultancy
- The supply of temporary staff
- Hardware
- Data centre colocation
Government Commercial Agency publishes specific guidance on services that cannot be purchased through G-Cloud 14 or that should be procured through another agreement.
Who can use G-Cloud?
G-Cloud 14 is available to a wide range of public sector and eligible non profit organisations.
This includes:
- Central government
- Local authorities
- Education organisations
- Health organisations
- Charities
- Police services
- Fire and rescue services
- Ambulance services
- Search and rescue organisations
- Devolved administrations
- British overseas territories
- Government agencies
- Arm’s length bodies
- Other eligible public bodies
Government guidance states that public sector organisations can access G-Cloud through the Contract Award Service within the Public Procurement Gateway. Buyers must also meet the eligibility requirements for the agreement.
Each organisation should confirm its eligibility and complete its own internal procurement approvals before making an award.
Why public sector organisations use G-Cloud
An established route to market
G-Cloud gives buyers access to an existing catalogue of cloud services and standard contract documents.
This can reduce the time and resource required when compared with creating a completely separate procurement structure.
Published supplier information
Suppliers publish information about their services in advance.
Depending on the service this may include:
- Service descriptions
- Features
- Pricing
- Support arrangements
- Onboarding information
- Data backup arrangements
- Exit provisions
- Terms and conditions
- Security information
- Technical requirements
This allows buyers to complete a structured desktop evaluation.
Access to specialist suppliers
G-Cloud includes both large technology companies and specialist providers.
This gives public sector buyers an opportunity to consider suppliers that may offer deeper expertise or more focused technology than a broad legacy provider.
Standard contract documents
The framework provides standard terms, schedules and order documents.
These create a consistent commercial structure for buyers and suppliers.
Direct award route
For G-Cloud 14 Lots 1 to 3 buyers can make a direct award after completing the required buying process.
This does not mean choosing a preferred supplier without an evaluation. The buyer must follow the framework process and retain evidence showing how the decision was reached.
Important G-Cloud terms
Buyer
The public sector or eligible organisation purchasing the service.
Supplier
A company with a service listed on the relevant G-Cloud framework.
Cloud software
An application that is hosted in the cloud and normally accessed through the internet or a private network.
Service listing
The published information describing a supplier’s service, features, pricing and conditions.
Desktop evaluation
The process of assessing published supplier information against the buyer’s agreed requirements and evaluation criteria.
Longlist
The initial group of services that appear potentially capable of meeting the requirement.
Shortlist
The smaller group of services that meet the buyer’s essential requirements and will receive a detailed evaluation.
Clarification question
A question used to clarify published information about a service or its price.
A clarification should not be used to redesign the supplier’s service or create a new tender process.
Direct award
The award of a contract to the supplier that best meets the requirement after the buyer has followed the prescribed buying and evaluation process.
Call off contract
The contract created between the buyer and the selected supplier under the framework.
Order form
The document that records the selected service, charges, contract period and other required information.
How to buy HR and payroll software through G-Cloud
Step 1: Build the right project team
HR and payroll procurement should not be treated as an isolated software purchase.
The project team may need representatives from:
- HR
- Payroll
- Finance
- Procurement
- IT
- Information security
- Data protection
- Operations
- Learning and development
- Senior leadership
- Employee or user groups
The exact team will depend on the size and structure of the organisation.
Including the right people early helps the organisation identify operational requirements, technical dependencies and implementation risks before the evaluation begins.
Step 2: Define the problem
Start by identifying what the organisation needs to improve.
Examples might include:
- Too many disconnected systems
- Repeated manual data entry
- Payroll data arriving late
- Limited workforce reporting
- Poor employee self service
- Weak oversight across multiple sites
- Inconsistent processes between departments
- Reliance on spreadsheets
- Incomplete audit trails
- Difficulty managing multiple roles or contracts
- Limited integration between attendance and payroll
- Excessive administration
- Lack of reliable workforce cost information
- Outdated software that is difficult to support
This creates a clearer basis for the procurement than copying the features of the existing system.
Step 3: Define the scope
Document what the project will cover.
This should include:
- Number of employees
- Number of workers
- Number of payroll records
- Number of legal entities
- Number of locations
- Departments and services
- Pay frequencies
- Worker types
- Contract types
- Working patterns
- Current systems
- Required integrations
- Data migration
- Required modules
- Expected implementation period
- Contract term
- Available budget
- Internal project resources
Where relevant the scope should also cover volunteers, casual workers, contractors, temporary workers and employees with more than one role.
Step 4: Separate essential and desirable requirements
Every requirement should be classified clearly.
Essential requirements
These are requirements that a supplier must meet.
Examples might include:
- UK payroll capability
- Multiple payrolls
- Multiple organisations
- Role based permissions
- Employee self service
- Manager self service
- Data migration
- Audit trails
- Required security standards
- Required pension support
- Required statutory reports
- Required integration capability
Desirable requirements
These are valuable but would not automatically exclude a service.
Examples might include:
- Advanced AI reporting
- Additional employee engagement tools
- Automated document creation
- Future international payroll support
- Optional learning functionality
- Additional mobile functionality
This distinction makes the longlisting and shortlisting process more defensible.
Step 5: Agree the evaluation criteria
The evaluation criteria should be agreed before detailed supplier assessment begins.
Potential categories include:
- Functional capability
- Technical compatibility
- Information security
- Data protection
- Implementation
- Data migration
- Service and support
- Accessibility
- User experience
- Reporting
- Integration
- Commercial fit
- Exit arrangements
- Social value
- Total cost
- Overall value for money
G-Cloud 14 does not set one universal evaluation weighting for cloud software purchases. Buyers must determine criteria and weightings that are appropriate to their requirement.
The final weighting should reflect risk.
For example payroll accuracy, security and implementation may carry more importance than a minor user interface preference.
Step 6: Search for relevant services
Buyers can search for cloud services through the Contract Award Service.
Search terms should describe the genuine requirement.
Relevant searches might include:
- HR software
- Payroll software
- HR and payroll software
- Public sector HR software
- Public sector payroll software
- Workforce management software
- Managed payroll
- Time and attendance
- Rota management
- Employee management
- Local government HR software
- Education HR and payroll
- Multi Academy Trust HR software
- Housing association HR software
- AI HR software
- Cloud payroll
- Employee self service
- Workforce analytics
Searches should not be constructed simply to return a preferred supplier.
Keep a record of:
- Search terms
- Search date
- Filters used
- Number of services returned
- Reasons for excluding services
- Services taken forward
This evidence supports the audit trail and helps demonstrate that the process was fair.
Step 7: Create the longlist
Review the initial search results and remove services that clearly cannot meet the essential requirements.
A service might be excluded because:
- It does not provide payroll
- It cannot support the required workforce size
- It cannot support multiple entities
- It does not meet mandatory security requirements
- It does not provide the required statutory functionality
- It cannot meet a necessary implementation deadline
- It does not provide the required service model
- Its published scope does not match the requirement
Exclusion reasons should be recorded clearly.
Step 8: Create the shortlist
Assess each longlisted service against the essential requirements.
The shortlist should include only services that appear capable of meeting the organisation’s needs.
Review all available supplier documents including:
- Service definition
- Pricing document
- Terms and conditions
- Support information
- Onboarding process
- Data migration approach
- Backup and recovery
- Exit arrangements
- Security information
- Service constraints
- Technical requirements
Government Commercial Agency provides evaluation templates including longlist tools, shortlist matrices and score sheets.
Step 9: Ask clarification questions
Buyers may ask suppliers to clarify published information.
Useful clarification questions might include:
- Which part of your published service meets this requirement?
- Which published pricing applies to our organisation?
- Is this feature included within the listed service?
- What buyer resources are required during implementation?
- How is historical data migrated?
- How are payroll critical incidents managed?
- What response time applies to a priority incident?
- Which integration method is included?
- What data can be exported at contract end?
- Which subcontractors support the service?
Clarification questions should not become a hidden request for proposal or negotiation exercise.
Step 10: Use demonstrations correctly
Demonstrations are permitted under G-Cloud 14.
Where demonstrations form part of the scored evaluation each shortlisted supplier must receive an equal opportunity to demonstrate its service. The demonstration criteria must be recorded in advance and applied consistently.
A structured demonstration agenda may include:
- Creating an employee record
- Processing a contractual change
- Running payroll
- Managing multiple roles
- Approving overtime
- Producing a workforce report
- Managing a document workflow
- Configuring permissions
- Demonstrating an audit trail
- Completing an employee self service task
- Showing how AI access is governed
Buyers should avoid demonstrations that consist only of a supplier’s preferred sales presentation.
The demonstration should test the actual requirement.
Step 11: Complete the detailed evaluation
Each shortlisted service should be assessed against the same criteria.
The evaluation record should explain:
- What was assessed
- How each score was reached
- Which evidence supported the score
- Which risks were identified
- How pricing was calculated
- Why the selected service offered the best fit
- Why unsuccessful services were not selected
Value for money does not necessarily mean the lowest headline subscription price.
It may also include:
- Reduced manual work
- Fewer software systems
- Lower integration cost
- Improved payroll accuracy
- Reduced administration
- Better compliance
- Improved reporting
- Lower implementation risk
- Better support
- Reduced reliance on spreadsheets
- Improved employee experience
- Reduced cost of maintaining legacy software
Step 12: Complete due diligence
Before award buyers should complete the checks required by their organisation.
These may include:
- Information security review
- Data protection impact assessment
- Financial checks
- Legal review
- Accessibility assessment
- Technical architecture review
- Integration review
- Business continuity assessment
- Reference checks
- Implementation risk review
- Internal financial approval
- Procurement approval
Step 13: Award the contract
Once the evaluation and internal approval process is complete the buyer can award the call off contract using the relevant G-Cloud documentation.
The buyer should complete the required order form and contract documents.
G-Cloud 14 call off contracts can initially run for up to 36 months. One extension of up to 12 months may be included where it is specified in the original contract terms. The maximum total duration is therefore normally 48 months. Additional controls can apply to central government contracts beyond 24 months.
Step 14: Prepare for implementation
Contract award is the beginning of the delivery process.
The buyer and supplier should agree:
- Project governance
- Responsibilities
- Timelines
- Data migration
- Data cleansing
- Configuration
- Integration
- Testing
- Payroll parallel runs
- User acceptance testing
- Training
- Communications
- Go live criteria
- Support arrangements
- Escalation routes
A realistic implementation plan should recognise that data quality and internal decision making can affect delivery as much as the technology itself.
Direct award does not mean automatic award
G-Cloud 14 allows direct award for Lots 1 to 3 after the buyer has followed the buying process.
It does not allow a buyer to choose a supplier first and justify the decision afterwards.
The buyer should:
- Define the requirement
- Agree the evaluation process
- Search the available services
- Create a longlist
- Create a shortlist
- Evaluate suitable services
- Record the decision
- Complete the contract documents
Further competition is not permitted for G-Cloud 14 Lots 1 to 3.
Government Commercial Agency states that introducing a mini competition, RFI, RFQ, RFP, ITT or price negotiation would breach the terms of the agreement for these lots. Clarification questions about published services and pricing are permitted.
This is an important distinction.
Buyers should not recreate a traditional tender inside the G-Cloud direct award process.
How to evaluate HR and payroll software
Start with the employee record
The employee record sits at the centre of the workforce platform.
Ask whether the service creates one reliable source of employee information across:
- HR
- Payroll
- Attendance
- Rotas
- Recruitment
- Onboarding
- Performance
- Learning
- Documents
- Reporting
Where systems are disconnected organisations often experience:
- Duplicate entry
- Conflicting records
- Delayed updates
- Manual reconciliation
- Payroll errors
- Weak reporting
- Poor audit trails
- Increased administration
A connected platform should allow approved employee changes to flow through the relevant processes without unnecessary rekeying.
HBHR connects HR, payroll, time and attendance and workforce information within one platform.
Evaluating payroll capability
Payroll is a critical operational service.
Errors can affect employees directly and create financial, regulatory and reputational risk.
Buyers should assess:
- Payroll calculation capability
- Statutory deductions
- Multiple payrolls
- Multiple pay frequencies
- Multiple organisations
- Multiple assignments
- Overtime
- Allowances
- Benefits
- Pension deductions
- Holiday pay
- Sickness
- Maternity and family leave
- Starters and leavers
- Back pay
- Retrospective changes
- Payroll approvals
- Variance reporting
- Audit trails
- Payment files
- Payslips
- Year end processing
- Reporting to HMRC
- Business continuity
- Disaster recovery
- Managed payroll options
Questions to ask
- Does approved HR information flow into payroll automatically?
- How are contractual changes controlled?
- How are payroll anomalies identified?
- How are calculations checked?
- Can the platform support our pension arrangements?
- How does the service manage multiple posts?
- Can managers see payroll related costs before approval?
- What happens if the organisation cannot complete payroll internally?
- Is a managed payroll service available?
- Who supports a payroll critical incident?
- How quickly will the supplier respond?
HBHR connects workforce data to payroll and provides AI supported alerts that can flag anomalies before payroll is finalised. It also offers a fully managed payroll service delivered by in house specialists.
Evaluating complex workforce structures
Public sector workforces are rarely simple.
The platform may need to support:
- Multiple legal entities
- Shared services
- Multiple departments
- Multiple locations
- Employees with several roles
- Employees with several contracts
- Permanent employees
- Temporary employees
- Casual workers
- Volunteers
- Term time employees
- Shift workers
- Variable hours
- On call arrangements
- Different grades
- Different pay rules
- Local terms
- National terms
- Cost centres
- Funding codes
- Complex approval structures
Buyers should test the platform against real workforce scenarios.
A system that works well for one standard office worker may not work well for an employee with two posts across different sites and different working patterns.
Evaluating time and attendance
Where employees work shifts or variable hours the connection between attendance and payroll is especially important.
Assess whether the service can:
- Create rotas
- Record attendance
- Support mobile clocking
- Support physical clocking devices
- Track scheduled and actual hours
- Manage breaks
- Calculate overtime
- Manage shift changes
- Record absence
- Route hours for approval
- Transfer approved information to payroll
- Report on labour cost
- Support multiple sites
- Apply different rules to different groups
HBHR provides time and attendance functionality connected to its wider HR and payroll platform.
Evaluating reporting and analytics
Public sector leaders require reliable workforce information.
Reporting should not depend on repeated spreadsheet work or supplier intervention.
Buyers should assess whether users can:
- Build reports
- Save reports
- Schedule reports
- Create dashboards
- Report across entities
- Report across sites
- Report across departments
- Restrict access to sensitive fields
- Review trends
- Export information
- Track data changes
- Produce audit information
- Compare workforce cost
- Monitor absence
- Review turnover
- Identify compliance gaps
HBHR provides configurable reporting across HR, payroll and attendance data. Its analytics capability can create reports and dashboards from connected workforce information.
Evaluating employee and manager experience
A technically capable platform can still fail if people find it difficult to use.
The evaluation should consider the experience of:
- Employees
- Line managers
- HR teams
- Payroll teams
- Finance teams
- System administrators
- Operational managers
- Senior leaders
Assess:
- Browser access
- Mobile access
- Accessibility
- Ease of navigation
- Employee self service
- Manager self service
- Leave requests
- Approval processes
- Document access
- Payslip access
- Personal information updates
- Notifications
- Training requirements
- Support for employees without regular computer access
The system should make routine workforce processes easier without weakening oversight or control.
Evaluating integrations
HR and payroll platforms often need to exchange information with other systems.
Potential integrations include:
- Finance
- Pension providers
- Identity management
- Single sign on
- Microsoft services
- Banking and payment providers
- Recruitment services
- Background checking providers
- Learning platforms
- Business intelligence tools
- Expenses
- Benefits
- Existing public sector systems
Buyers should establish:
- Whether an integration already exists
- Whether an API is available
- Whether file transfer is required
- Whether manual intervention is needed
- Who will build the integration
- Who will support it
- What it will cost
- What happens when either system changes
- How failures are monitored
- How data is protected in transit
HBHR offers an open API and integrates directly with many 3rd party applications.
Security and data protection
HR and payroll platforms hold highly sensitive information.
This can include:
- Names
- Addresses
- Dates of birth
- National Insurance numbers
- Bank information
- Salary information
- Employment records
- Absence information
- Medical information
- Performance information
- Disciplinary information
- Equality information
- Identity documents
- Right to Work evidence
- Criminal record check information
Security should therefore be treated as a central evaluation area.
Evidence to request
Buyers may wish to request:
- Information security certifications
- Cyber security certifications
- Data protection policies
- Data processing terms
- Hosting information
- Data location information
- Subprocessor information
- Encryption standards
- Penetration testing information
- Vulnerability management processes
- Incident management processes
- Backup arrangements
- Recovery arrangements
- Business continuity plans
- Access control information
- Audit logging information
- Data retention arrangements
- Secure deletion processes
- Exit arrangements
Access control
The platform should support permissions based on:
- Role
- Responsibility
- Department
- Site
- Entity
- Data type
- Management level
A manager should only see the information needed to perform their role.
Sensitive payroll, medical and employee relations information should not become visible simply because someone has general manager access.
Data protection
Buyers should establish:
- Whether the supplier acts as a processor
- Where information is stored
- Whether data leaves the UK
- Which subprocessors are involved
- How international transfers are managed
- How subject access requests are supported
- How data is deleted
- What happens at contract end
- How incidents are reported
HBHR publishes information stating that it is ISO 27001 certified and protected by Cyber Essentials standards. It also describes the platform as being built around GDPR requirements and HMRC compliant payroll processes. Buyers should request current certificates and documentation as part of their own due diligence.
Evaluating artificial intelligence in HR and payroll
Artificial intelligence can reduce administration and improve access to workforce information.
It can also introduce risk if access, oversight and accountability are unclear.
Buyers should not accept the word “AI” as evidence of value.
They should establish exactly what the technology does.
Questions to ask an AI enabled supplier
- Is the AI built into the platform?
- Is it supplied by another company?
- Which workforce data can it access?
- Does it follow existing user permissions?
- Can it read sensitive information?
- Can it create reports?
- Can it change records?
- Can it complete actions?
- Does a person approve each action?
- Are AI activities logged?
- Can capabilities be disabled?
- Is customer data used to train general models?
- How are inaccurate responses handled?
- How does the supplier test the AI?
- What safeguards prevent unauthorised action?
- What information is available for a data protection impact assessment?
- How is human oversight maintained?
AI should support control rather than remove it
The strongest use of AI within HR and payroll is not simply producing text faster.
Useful applications may include:
- Building workforce reports
- Identifying payroll anomalies
- Finding compliance gaps
- Producing draft documents
- Answering policy questions
- Analysing workforce trends
- Supporting absence analysis
- Completing authorised administrative tasks
- Forecasting workforce demand
- Helping managers access relevant information
Human accountability should remain clear.
HRGenie is built into the HBHR platform rather than being provided as a separate chatbot. HBHR states that it can support reporting, leave, payroll workflows and wider workforce actions. HBHR also states that actions require user instruction and approval.
Evaluating implementation
Implementation is one of the greatest sources of risk in an HR or payroll project.
A strong platform can still produce a poor outcome where:
- Data is inaccurate
- Responsibilities are unclear
- Decisions are delayed
- Processes are not agreed
- Testing is rushed
- Managers are not trained
- Payroll parallel runs are incomplete
- Employees do not understand the change
Areas to assess
Project governance
- Who leads the implementation?
- Who makes decisions?
- How often will the project team meet?
- How are risks recorded?
- How are issues escalated?
- What happens if milestones are missed?
Data migration
- Which data will be migrated?
- How many years of history are included?
- Are documents included?
- Who cleans the data?
- How is data validated?
- How are rejected records managed?
- How is migration signed off?
Configuration
- Who configures workflows?
- Who configures permissions?
- Who configures payroll rules?
- How are approval structures agreed?
- What changes can the buyer make after launch?
Testing
- What testing is required?
- Who creates test scenarios?
- How are defects recorded?
- How are fixes confirmed?
- How many payroll parallel runs will take place?
- What must be completed before go live?
Training
- Is administrator training included?
- Is payroll training included?
- Is manager training included?
- Is employee guidance provided?
- Are recordings available?
- Is training repeated after launch?
Go live
- What are the go live criteria?
- Who approves go live?
- What support is available during launch?
- What happens if payroll is at risk?
- What is the fallback plan?
HBHR describes its service as including structured hands on onboarding and ongoing human support.
Evaluating support
Support should be assessed before the contract is awarded rather than after a problem occurs.
Ask:
- What are the support hours?
- How can users contact support?
- Are telephone and online channels available?
- How are incidents prioritised?
- What is the response time?
- What is the resolution target?
- How are payroll critical incidents handled?
- Is there an escalation process?
- Will the organisation have named contacts?
- Who supports integrations?
- Who supports data issues?
- What support is included?
- What support carries an additional cost?
- How is service performance reported?
For payroll services the buyer should understand what happens when an urgent issue affects employee pay.
HBHR positions its onboarding and support around direct access to people rather than relying solely on anonymous support tickets.
Evaluating commercial value
The subscription price is only one element of cost.
Buyers should calculate the total cost of the service over the proposed contract period.
This may include:
- Software subscription
- Implementation
- Data migration
- Configuration
- Integration
- Training
- Payroll services
- Support
- Additional storage
- Additional environments
- Optional modules
- Payment services
- Contract increases
- Exit support
Buyers should also consider the cost of keeping the current arrangements.
This may include:
- Several separate subscriptions
- Manual administration
- Repeated data entry
- Payroll corrections
- Spreadsheet maintenance
- Custom integrations
- Reporting delays
- Internal support time
- Compliance risk
- Poor employee experience
A service with a higher subscription price may provide better overall value if it replaces several systems and reduces internal administration.
Exit arrangements and data ownership
Exit planning should be considered before the contract starts.
Buyers should establish:
- Who owns the data
- Which data can be exported
- Which format will be used
- Whether documents can be exported
- Whether payroll history can be exported
- Whether audit history can be exported
- How long an export will take
- Whether exit support is chargeable
- When access will end
- When backups will be deleted
- How deletion will be confirmed
- What support will be provided to a replacement supplier
A strong exit plan reduces the risk of supplier lock in and supports future procurement.
What evidence should buyers request?
A structured evidence pack may include:
Service information
- Service definition
- Features and modules
- Technical requirements
- Service constraints
- Product roadmap approach
Commercial information
- Pricing document
- Implementation charges
- Integration charges
- Support charges
- Contract increase mechanism
- Exit charges
Security information
- Current certifications
- Penetration testing summary
- Vulnerability management policy
- Incident response process
- Business continuity plan
- Disaster recovery information
- Backup policy
- Access control information
Data protection information
- Data processing agreement
- Subprocessor list
- Data location
- International transfer arrangements
- Data retention policy
- Secure deletion process
Implementation information
- Implementation plan
- Responsibility matrix
- Migration template
- Testing approach
- Training plan
- Go live criteria
- Escalation process
Service information
- Support model
- Service levels
- Priority definitions
- Escalation routes
- Service reporting
- Maintenance process
Assurance information
- Customer references
- Relevant case studies
- Accessibility documentation
- Insurance
- Financial information where required
- Social value statement
Why public sector organisations consider HBHR
One connected platform
HBHR brings together:
- Core HR
- Payroll
- Managed payroll
- Time and attendance
- Rotas
- Recruitment
- Digital onboarding
- Performance management
- Expenses
- Leave and absence
- Documents
- Electronic signatures
- Workforce reporting
- Employee communications
- Engagement
- AI supported workforce management
This allows organisations to manage the employee journey from recruitment through to pay within one connected environment.
HR and payroll connected
Approved information can flow between HR, attendance and payroll.
This reduces the need to rekey changes between separate systems and can improve visibility before payroll is finalised.
HBHR supports both in house payroll and fully managed payroll.
Built in AI
HRGenie is built into the HBHR platform.
It can support reporting, workforce queries, document creation and authorised workforce actions while maintaining user oversight.
Reporting across connected data
HBHR reporting can use information across HR, payroll and attendance.
This gives leadership teams a broader view of workforce activity, cost and risk.
Human onboarding and support
HBHR combines technology with structured onboarding and ongoing human support.
This is particularly important where the implementation involves payroll, complex workforce rules or several organisations.
Security and compliance
HBHR publishes information covering ISO 27001 certification, Cyber Essentials and GDPR focused data protection. Buyers can request current evidence during the procurement process.
HBHR for education and Multi Academy Trusts
Education organisations require more than a standard employee database.
Schools, academies and trusts may need to manage:
- Multiple schools
- Central trust teams
- Academic employees
- Professional services employees
- Term time contracts
- Multiple posts
- Teachers’ Pension Scheme
- Local Government Pension Scheme
- School Workforce Census
- Single Central Record
- DBS information
- Right to Work documentation
- Safeguarding information
- Local and central permissions
- Trust wide reporting
HBHR supports School Workforce Census reporting, Single Central Record management, Teachers’ Pension Scheme, Local Government Pension Scheme, complex contracts and multi post structures. It also supports multi site and multi entity environments with configurable permissions.
HBHR for local government
Local authorities manage diverse workforces across a wide range of services.
These may include:
- Corporate services
- Social care
- Environmental services
- Housing
- Community services
- Customer services
- Libraries
- Leisure
- Operational teams
- Mobile workers
A suitable local government HR and payroll platform should support central governance while allowing departments to manage their own employees appropriately.
HBHR can support local government organisations with:
- Central employee records
- Multiple departments
- Multiple sites
- Multiple contracts
- Role based permissions
- HR and payroll integration
- Time and attendance
- Leave and absence
- Digital onboarding
- Document management
- Compliance tracking
- Workforce reporting
- Cost centre reporting
- Audit trails
- Manager self service
- Employee self service
- Managed payroll options
HBHR for housing associations
Housing associations often employ people across offices, housing schemes, community settings and customer locations.
The workforce may include:
- Housing officers
- Property teams
- Repairs teams
- Customer service employees
- Support workers
- Community teams
- Finance teams
- HR teams
- Mobile employees
- On call employees
HBHR can support housing organisations with:
- Mobile employee access
- Multi site workforce management
- Rotas
- Time recording
- On call arrangements
- Payroll integration
- Recruitment
- Digital onboarding
- Mandatory training records
- Document control
- Absence management
- Performance management
- Workforce cost reporting
- Role based permissions
- Audit ready employee information
Read more: HR and Payroll Software for Housing Associations
HBHR for the wider public sector
HBHR can support organisations across:
- Central government
- Local government
- Education
- Healthcare
- Housing
- Charities
- Community services
- Blue light services
- Arm’s length bodies
- Public agencies
- Shared service organisations
The platform is particularly relevant where organisations need to manage complex structures, dispersed teams, sensitive information and connected HR and payroll processes.
Read more: HR and Payroll Software for the Public Sector, HR and Payroll Software for the NHS, HR and Payroll Software for Housing Associations and HR and Payroll Software for Education.
Public sector HR and payroll procurement checklist
Organisation
- Have we identified every entity and site?
- Have we confirmed the number of employees and payroll records?
- Have we included all worker types?
- Have we identified employees with multiple roles?
- Have we documented every pay frequency?
- Have we involved HR, payroll, finance, procurement and IT?
Requirements
- Have we separated essential and desirable requirements?
- Have we documented the problems we need to solve?
- Have we avoided copying the limitations of the current system?
- Have we defined reporting needs?
- Have we defined integration needs?
- Have we defined security requirements?
- Have we defined accessibility requirements?
G-Cloud process
- Have we confirmed that G-Cloud is the correct route?
- Have we recorded our search terms?
- Have we retained the search results?
- Have we documented longlist exclusions?
- Have we documented shortlist decisions?
- Have we applied the same criteria to every service?
- Have we avoided creating a mini competition?
- Have clarification questions remained within the framework rules?
HR
- Can the system support our complete employee record?
- Can it support multiple roles and contracts?
- Can it support our approval structure?
- Can it manage leave and absence?
- Can it manage documents and acknowledgements?
- Can employees and managers use self service?
Payroll
- Does HR information flow into payroll?
- Can the service support every payroll?
- Can it support our pension requirements?
- Can it manage overtime and allowances?
- Can it identify unusual changes?
- Does it provide a complete audit trail?
- Is managed payroll available?
- Is business continuity clearly documented?
Workforce management
- Can the system manage rotas?
- Can it track time and attendance?
- Can it support mobile employees?
- Can approved hours flow into payroll?
- Can managers see labour cost?
Reporting
- Can users build their own reports?
- Can reports be scheduled?
- Can access to sensitive information be restricted?
- Can we report by entity, service, location and cost centre?
- Can leadership teams access current workforce information?
Security
- Have we reviewed current certifications?
- Do we understand where data is hosted?
- Do we understand which subprocessors are used?
- Are access controls appropriate?
- Are audit logs available?
- Have we reviewed business continuity?
- Have we reviewed the incident process?
- Have we completed our data protection assessment?
AI
- Do we know which information the AI can access?
- Does it follow user permissions?
- Are actions approved by a person?
- Are AI activities logged?
- Can features be controlled?
- Is customer data used for model training?
- Is sufficient information available for governance review?
Implementation
- Is the implementation plan realistic?
- Are responsibilities clear?
- Is data migration included?
- Is data cleansing included?
- Are integrations included?
- Is payroll parallel testing included?
- Is training included?
- Are go live criteria agreed?
Support
- Are support hours clear?
- Are response times clear?
- Is payroll critical support available?
- Are escalation routes documented?
- Will we have access to experienced people?
- Is ongoing support included in the price?
Commercial
- Have we calculated the total contract cost?
- Are implementation costs included?
- Are integration costs included?
- Are future price increases clear?
- Are exit costs clear?
- Can we export all required data?
- Does the service represent overall value for money?
Ready to explore HBHR through G-Cloud?
Choosing HR and payroll software is a significant operational decision.
The right platform should do more than replace paper processes or move existing administration online.
It should connect people information with payroll, attendance, compliance and reporting. It should give employees a better experience and give managers reliable workforce information.
It should also provide the security, governance and support expected by a public sector organisation.
HBHR brings HR, payroll, time and attendance, recruitment, performance and workforce reporting together within one connected platform.
Built in AI supports reporting, insight and authorised workforce actions while keeping people in control.
Speak to the HBHR public sector team
We can help your organisation:
- Understand the HBHR G-Cloud service
- Review the published service information
- Arrange a tailored demonstration
- Map HBHR against your requirements
- Clarify implementation and migration
- Understand the available service and pricing options
- Review HR, payroll and workforce management capabilities
Important information
This guide provides general information about G-Cloud and the procurement of HR and payroll software.
It does not constitute legal, financial or procurement advice.
Buyers should review the latest Government Commercial Agency guidance and follow their own procurement, legal, finance, information security and data protection procedures.
G-Cloud and HR software: common questions
Short answers to what public sector buyers ask most about procuring HR and payroll software through G-Cloud.
Yes. Cloud based HR software can be purchased through the cloud software category where the service meets the scope of the framework. This can include core HR, employee records, onboarding, absence, performance, reporting and employee self service.
Yes. Cloud based payroll software can be purchased through G-Cloud where it is offered as an established framework service. Buyers should assess calculation capability, compliance, pension support, payroll controls, audit trails, implementation and support.
Yes. A supplier may offer HR, payroll, time and attendance and workforce management within one cloud service or connected service structure.
A managed payroll service may be included where it forms part of the supplier’s published cloud service and supporting service model. Buyers should check the precise scope, responsibilities and published pricing.
No. The framework is used to procure cloud technology but the business requirement may be owned by HR, payroll, finance, operations or another service area. IT, procurement, security and data protection teams will normally support the evaluation.
Yes. G-Cloud 14 Lots 1 to 3 allow direct award after the buyer has completed the required search and evaluation process.
No. The buyer must define its requirement and evaluate relevant services. The selected supplier should be the service that best meets the documented requirement under the agreed criteria.
Not under G-Cloud 14 Lots 1 to 3. The framework requires a direct award process for these lots. A mini competition, RFI, RFQ, RFP, ITT or negotiation should not be introduced.
Yes. Buyers may ask questions that clarify the supplier’s published service or price. The questions should not materially change the service or become a separate tender process.
Yes. Demonstrations are permitted. Where they form part of the evaluation each shortlisted supplier should receive an equal opportunity and the demonstration criteria should be applied consistently.
No. The buyer should apply its agreed evaluation criteria and select the service that offers the best fit and overall value. Price remains important but it should be considered alongside capability, risk, implementation, security and support.
The initial call off period can be up to 36 months. One extension of up to 12 months can be included where it is specified in the original contract. This creates a normal maximum of 48 months.
Government Commercial Agency states that there is no minimum call off contract length.
Yes. HBHR connects HR, payroll, time and attendance and wider workforce management within one platform.
Yes. HBHR provides a fully managed payroll option delivered by in house payroll specialists.
HBHR can support multiple entities, locations, contracts, roles and working patterns. The exact configuration should be established during discovery and implementation.
Yes. HBHR supports schools, academies and Multi Academy Trusts with HR, payroll, School Workforce Census, Single Central Record, Teachers’ Pension Scheme, Local Government Pension Scheme and multi post structures.
Data migration can form part of the HBHR implementation process. The scope will depend on the existing platforms, data quality, history and documents that need to be moved.
HBHR publishes information covering ISO 27001 certification, Cyber Essentials and GDPR focused data protection. Buyers should obtain the latest evidence during due diligence.
Yes. HBHR can provide a demonstration focused on the organisation’s HR, payroll and workforce requirements.